It’s August 2025, and the UK has once again discovered that its wallet is empty, its credit card is maxed out, and the government is trying to look respectable while digging under the sofa cushions for loose change. The conversation has turned, as it inevitably does, to that magical question: how do we fix Britain’s public finances?
Enter the panel of economic sages, each armed with a pet idea and the grim determination of people who know they’ll be ignored by politicians anyway. Their suggestions range from “raise income tax, just get it over with” to “invest in growth and hope for the best.” Naturally, every idea comes with its own political landmine, because nothing says “fiscal responsibility” like detonating your re-election chances.
But let’s not just summarize these respectable proposals. Let’s dissect them with the honesty and snark they deserve. Because if you think anyone’s walking out of this budget debate with clean hands and a clear conscience, you’ve clearly mistaken Westminster for Disneyland.
Bite the Bullet – Raise Income Tax (Or How to Commit Political Suicide Gracefully)
Maha Rafi Atal, bless her Adam Smith–quoting heart, says what every politician knows but refuses to admit: if you want functioning public services, you’re going to have to raise income tax. Yes, the very thing Rachel Reeves promised not to do.
The logic is brutally simple: Britain’s services are collapsing faster than a Lidl deckchair, immigration caps are strangling the labor market, and national insurance hikes hit businesses like a brick. Borrowing would be an option if the UK’s debt costs weren’t currently competing with luxury superyacht prices. That leaves the big red button: raise income tax.
The political class, of course, recoils at the idea like Victorian ladies at the sight of an ankle. But the electorate? Polls suggest they’d actually prefer a tax hike to further NHS collapse. The people of Britain, apparently, are mature enough to accept the trade-off. Politicians? Not so much.
A 1% hike in the basic rate nets you £8 billion. That’s the kind of money that could actually keep hospitals staffed, schools heated, and potholes filled. But Reeves won’t do it. Because while voters might tolerate the pain, the Tory press would crucify her daily for committing the unspeakable sin of fiscal honesty.
So, raising income tax remains the policy equivalent of Brussels sprouts: healthy, effective, and utterly despised at Christmas dinner.
Inheritance Tax – Punishing Aspiration, or Finally Taxing the Undead?
Conor O’Kane throws another grenade into the mix: inheritance tax reform. Ah yes, Britain’s favorite bogeyman. The so-called “death tax,” which is only levied on the rich but somehow convinces your average semi-detached homeowner in Wigan that the government is coming for Grandma’s teapot.
Property values have skyrocketed, gifting loopholes are wider than the M25, and tightening the rules could raise serious revenue. It’s progressive, it’s fair, and it targets those who’ve benefited most from decades of housing mania. So of course it’s politically toxic.
Remember when tax breaks for farmers were cut in 2024 and they responded with tractor blockades and enough manure to fertilize Parliament Square? Yeah. Imagine that, but with Range Rover convoys from Surrey.
The truth is, inheritance tax could fund a lot of broken services. But Labour risks being painted as the Party of Dream Killers, punishing hardworking families for the crime of owning property in a bubble economy. Opposition MPs will scream about aspiration. The tabloids will run daily headlines about “Granny’s House Seized by Labour.” And all for revenue that might be dodged anyway by a competent accountant.
Politically, this is like promising to fix the NHS by drowning puppies: technically possible, morally defensible to some, but electorally catastrophic.
Keep Freezing Income Tax Bands – The “Boil the Frog” Strategy
Steve Schifferes takes a more devious route: don’t raise taxes, just quietly freeze thresholds until inflation does the dirty work. The technical term is “fiscal drag.” The layman’s term is “pickpocketing without moving your lips.”
By 2028, this sneaky trick is already projected to raise £40 billion annually. Extending it a couple more years nets another £8 billion. And the best part? Most people won’t notice until long after the damage is done.
It’s perfect political camouflage. Reeves can claim she didn’t raise income tax rates, she just didn’t lower them. Voters see their paychecks stagnate but don’t quite connect the dots. It’s like stealing biscuits one by one instead of raiding the tin outright.
Of course, this is the fiscal equivalent of slowly boiling a frog. Eventually, the electorate figures out they’re cooked. But by then, the government’s either out of office or ready with a new scapegoat.
So yes, this is probably what Reeves will actually do. Not because it’s brave or clever, but because it’s cowardly enough to work.
Cutting Pension Tax Relief – Raid the Middle-Class Piggy Bank
Jonquil Lowe suggests another under-discussed option: go after pension tax relief. A juicy £52 billion is sitting there in the form of regressive handouts to the well-off. Two-thirds of the benefits flow to higher-rate taxpayers, mostly men. In other words, it’s a giant subsidy for middle-aged accountants who already have a golf club membership.
Cutting reliefs wouldn’t hurt the average worker nearly as much as the Daily Mail would claim. Auto-enrolment, not tax perks, drove pension savings. And most people don’t have the extra cash to stash anyway. So what’s the point of subsidizing the ones who do?
It’s a logical reform. It’s fair. It’s efficient. Which is exactly why it’ll never happen. Because Britain’s political class is built on the sacred altar of don’t annoy the middle classes. You can underfund schools, collapse social care, and melt down prisons, but if you touch Nigel’s pension pot, he’ll vote Tory until his dying breath.
Still, this idea has merit. Which means it’ll be shoved in a drawer marked “too sensible” until the next financial crisis.
Invest to Outgrow the Hole – Keynes with a Glow-Up
Finally, Guilherme Klein Martins brings the optimist’s dream: grow the economy out of debt. Invest 3% of GDP in public projects, from green energy to digital infrastructure, and let the magic of compounding do the rest. Each 1% of GDP in public investment boosts output by 1.5%. Over time, the debt-to-GDP ratio stabilizes, services improve, and the UK rises from the ashes like a phoenix powered by offshore wind.
It’s smart. It’s bold. It’s backed by international evidence. Which is why Britain will probably never do it.
Why? Because investment requires long-term thinking, and Westminster has the attention span of a toddler on a Haribo binge. Projects take years to deliver results, but politicians need headlines tomorrow. So instead of a coherent industrial strategy, we’ll get piecemeal gimmicks: ribbon-cutting on vanity rail projects, photo-ops at battery plants that may or may not exist, and endless speeches about “world-leading innovation” while potholes swallow cyclists whole.
The UK could absolutely invest its way out of stagnation. But given its track record, it’ll more likely invest in consultants, feasibility studies, and white elephants. The phoenix dream will end up as a pigeon with a limp.
The Grim Reality – Every Option Is Terrible
So where does this leave us? Each proposal is like choosing your favorite limb to amputate:
-
Raise income tax: politically suicidal.
-
Inheritance tax reform: electorally toxic.
-
Freeze tax bands: sneaky but corrosive.
-
Cut pension relief: rational but unpopular.
-
Invest for growth: visionary but requires competence.
The truth is, Britain’s finances can’t be fixed by any single measure. It’s going to take some combination of all these unpalatable options. Which means Reeves faces the impossible task of selling pain to a nation that already feels like it’s been mugged in broad daylight for the last 15 years.
And let’s be honest: the UK has been playing fiscal whack-a-mole for decades. Austerity gutted services, Brexit kneecapped trade, COVID torched the balance sheet, and Trussonomics… well, let’s just call that the financial equivalent of swallowing bleach. Now Reeves is left with the unenviable job of cleaning up the vomit while everyone blames her for the smell.
Conclusion – The Real Secret
So, what’s the secret to fixing the UK’s public finances? Here it is: stop pretending there’s a painless solution.
You either raise taxes, cut spending, or invest and hope growth saves you. Every path hurts. Every path risks backlash. And the longer you delay, the uglier the bill becomes.
Reeves will almost certainly go for the path of least resistance: fiscal drag plus a sprinkle of stealth reforms. Maybe some modest investment announcements for optics. Enough to paper over the cracks until the next election, when the cycle of denial, panic, and half-measures begins anew.
Britain’s finances won’t be “fixed.” They’ll be managed like a decrepit car: duct tape on the bumper, air freshener to hide the smell, and a prayer it survives one more MOT. The real secret is this: the public finances aren’t a solvable puzzle. They’re a chronic condition, and the UK’s political class is permanently on palliative care duty.
But hey, at least the economists got another panel discussion out of it.