If 2025 had a theme song, it wouldn’t be a pop anthem. It would be the gentle, defeated clatter of a “Store Closing” banner flapping in a half-empty strip mall parking lot, next to a pothole that’s been there since Obama’s first term. The year didn’t just thin the herd of American retail—it ran it through a wood chipper, live-streamed the results, and then asked consumers to “leave a review.”
More than 8,100 stores closed across the United States in 2025, according to Coresight Research—up roughly 12% from 2024. That’s not a “retail adjustment.” That’s a retail extinction event. And no, this wasn’t just about bad management or outdated brands. This was about a system that expects infinite growth from finite wallets, treats workers like optional software updates, and assumes consumers will forever forgive rising prices, shrinking quality, and checkout lines that feel like moral endurance tests.
Let’s take a tour through the wreckage. Not as a eulogy—but as an honest postmortem.
Bargain Hunt: When the Bargains Finally Ran Out
Bargain Hunt was supposed to be recession-proof. A Nashville-based discount chain with 92 stores across 10 states, it thrived on America’s favorite hobby: buying things we didn’t know we needed because they were cheaper than full price and psychologically irresistible under fluorescent lighting.
But in February 2025, Bargain Hunt filed for bankruptcy and announced it would shutter every location. All of them. No slow fade. No “select stores closing.” Just the retail equivalent of pulling the plug during the chorus.
The irony is rich. A store designed to survive bad economic times collapsed during a period defined by consumers hunting for deals harder than ever. Turns out discount retail only works if you can discount without discounting your margins into oblivion. When your entire business model is “cheap,” there’s no lower gear to drop into when costs rise.
Bargain Hunt didn’t fail because people stopped liking bargains. It failed because even bargain shoppers have limits—especially when wages stagnate, rent climbs, and groceries feel like luxury goods. At some point, a discounted blender still isn’t worth skipping a utility bill.
Forever 21: Fast Fashion Meets Faster Gravity
Forever 21’s demise was less a surprise and more a long-scheduled appointment that everyone kept postponing out of politeness.
The fast-fashion giant officially wound down its U.S. operations in 2025, citing brutal competition from overseas retailers like Shein and Temu, who operate with the speed of caffeine-fueled algorithms and the moral accountability of a ghost ship.
Forever 21 openly blamed the de minimis trade exemption, which allows foreign retailers to ship low-value goods into the U.S. without tariffs. Translation: global loopholes met domestic complacency, and the result was a retail knife fight in which Forever 21 brought mall rent and legacy overhead to a drone-delivered price war.
Once a symbol of aspirational affordability, Forever 21 became a museum of polyester regret—clothes designed for trends that expired before the credit card charge cleared. It wasn’t just competing with other brands; it was competing with infinite scroll, influencer hauls, and a generation trained to treat clothing like disposable content.
Fast fashion didn’t die. It just moved offshore, got faster, cheaper, and less apologetic.
Joann Fabrics: When the Craft Store Goes Quiet
There are closures that hurt economically, and then there are closures that hit culturally. Joann Fabrics was the latter.
Founded over 80 years ago, Joann wasn’t just a store—it was a community hub for quilters, sewists, DIY parents, theater kids, cosplayers, and anyone who ever thought, “I could make that myself.”
In February 2025, after declaring bankruptcy for the second time in as many years, Joann shuttered all U.S. locations. No buyer. No rescue. Just empty aisles where creativity once lived by the yard.
This wasn’t just about flagging sales. It was about the slow suffocation of hobbies in an economy that punishes time, patience, and anything that doesn’t monetize instantly. When people are exhausted, overworked, and broke, crafting becomes a luxury—not a refuge.
Joann didn’t fail because people stopped loving creativity. It failed because the modern economy leaves little room for it.
Liberated Brands: Surf’s Up, Doors Down
Liberated Brands, the Costa Mesa-based company behind surf and lifestyle labels like Billabong, Quiksilver, Roxy, Volcom, RVCA, and Spyder, closed all 122 stores in February 2025.
If this feels like a contradiction—surf culture being swallowed by corporate tides—that’s because it is. Brands built on rebellion, freedom, and beachside authenticity eventually became mall tenants competing for foot traffic between a pretzel stand and a phone repair kiosk.
The problem wasn’t the logos. It was the disconnect. Surf culture doesn’t thrive under fluorescent lights and quarterly earnings calls. Once these brands became lifestyle aesthetics instead of lifestyles, they were vulnerable to trend churn and online-only competitors who could sell the image without paying for physical space.
You can’t bottle freedom and expect it to survive rent increases.
Party City: The Party’s Over, But the Cleanup Is Forever
Party City’s collapse feels symbolic in ways that are almost too on the nose.
After declaring bankruptcy in late 2024, the party supplies chain closed hundreds of stores in 2025. A handful of independent franchises remain, and the brand survives online under new ownership. But the era of sprawling Party City locations—stuffed with disposable decorations for one-day celebrations—is effectively over.
This was inevitable. A store built around single-use joy couldn’t survive in an era of shrinking wallets, sustainability guilt, and Amazon delivering balloons faster than you can remember what you were celebrating.
The irony? We’re still having birthdays. We’re just doing them smaller, cheaper, and with fewer plastic banners spelling out “CONGRATS” in fonts no one actually likes.
Rite Aid: The Pharmacy That Couldn’t Fill Its Own Prescription
When Rite Aid announced in October 2025 that it would close all remaining locations, it marked the end of a chain founded in 1962—and the culmination of years of compounding problems.
Two bankruptcies in two years. Sluggish sales. Crushing legal costs tied to opioid litigation. A Justice Department complaint accusing the company of unlawfully filling prescriptions for oxycodone and fentanyl.
This wasn’t a single bad decision. It was an institutional failure that blended healthcare, profit incentives, regulatory capture, and corporate denial into one long unraveling.
What remains of Rite Aid today isn’t a pharmacy—it’s a website that helps former customers retrieve old records and find a new provider. A digital skeleton where a national chain once stood.
If there’s a lesson here, it’s this: you cannot simultaneously cut corners, chase volume, and play gatekeeper to controlled substances without consequences eventually arriving in bulk.
Sonder: When “Disruption” Locks You Out
Sonder’s collapse in November 2025 was abrupt, chaotic, and deeply on brand for the modern tech-hospitality experiment.
Once billed as a sleek alternative to Airbnb, Sonder ceased operations after Marriott ended its licensing deal, citing delayed integrations, ballooning costs, and a sharp revenue decline linked to its participation in Marriott’s Bonvoy system.
Guests were left stranded. Some locked out. Others scrambling for refunds and explanations.
This wasn’t just a business failure—it was a reminder that “platform innovation” often masks fragile infrastructure. When everything depends on partnerships, APIs, and alignment that never quite happens, the result isn’t disruption. It’s abandonment.
The future of travel may be digital, but trust still matters. And Sonder spent it faster than it earned it.
What These Closures Really Tell Us
This wasn’t a random assortment of failures. It was a pattern.
Brick-and-mortar retail is being squeezed from every direction:
-
Rising rents
-
Shrinking margins
-
Online competitors exploiting regulatory gaps
-
Consumers with less disposable income
-
A workforce stretched thin and paid thinner
But beyond economics, this was cultural. Stores that once served as third spaces—places to browse, linger, and belong—were replaced by transactional pipelines optimized for speed and scale.
Retail didn’t just lose relevance. It lost patience.
The Aftermath: Empty Stores, Full Carts (Somewhere Else)
The closures of 2025 didn’t eliminate consumer demand. They redirected it—mostly online, often overseas, and increasingly into platforms that don’t employ locally, don’t invest locally, and don’t close with a sign you can tape to the window.
The malls will be quieter. The strip centers emptier. The parking lots more symbolic than functional.
And somewhere, a former employee is still waiting on a final paycheck that arrived as an automated email apology.
Final Thoughts: This Wasn’t Just a Bad Year
2025 wasn’t an anomaly. It was a stress test—and much of retail failed it.
What died wasn’t shopping. It was the illusion that stores could survive on nostalgia, scale, and inertia alone. The brands that vanished weren’t just unlucky. They were caught between a past that no longer worked and a future they couldn’t afford to reach.
The doors are closed. The lights are off. The clearance signs are gone.
And the economy keeps asking, with a straight face:
“Have you tried adapting faster?”